AssayIndex
Identity

Identity by LC-MS

What a mass measurement establishes, what resolution buys you, and the specific compound pairs where unit resolution is not enough.

method reference4 sections3 pharmacopoeial references

Identity confirmation by mass spectrometry compares an observed mass against a theoretical mass calculated from the molecular formula. If they agree within a stated tolerance, the observed species has the elemental composition of the named compound. That is the entire claim. It is a strong claim and a narrow one.

Monoisotopic or average

The index computes theoretical masses monoisotopically — the sum of the masses of the most abundant isotope of each atom — and every ppm error on the site is calculated against a monoisotopic value. For a 4,813 Da peptide the monoisotopic and average masses differ by about 3 Da, which is 620 ppm. Reporting an observed monoisotopic mass against a theoretical average mass produces an apparent error of that size, and it is the single commonest cause of a spurious mass-accuracy flag in the index.

Charge states

Electrospray ionisation produces multiply protonated species. The measured quantity is m/z, not mass:

m/z = (M + z × 1.007276) / z

for M = 4 810.4103 Da (tirzepatide):

  z = 3   m/z = 1 604.4794
  z = 4   m/z = 1 203.6106      ← base peak
  z = 5   m/z =   963.0900
  z = 6   m/z =   802.7429

The neutral mass is recovered by deconvolution across the charge-state envelope. An error of one in the assigned charge state produces a mass error of hundreds of daltons, so a very large apparent error should always prompt a check of the assignment before any conclusion about the material.

Resolution, and the pairs where it decides the answer

A single-quadrupole instrument at unit resolution can tell a 4,813 Da species from a 4,764 Da species. It cannot tell a 1,025.16 Da species from a 1,024.18 Da species with any confidence. The index therefore records identity as confirmed only where a high-resolution instrument was used, and as consistent with otherwise, naming the alternatives not excluded.

PairΔ massΔ retention on RG-2Excluded at unit resolution?
Bremelanotide / Melanotan II0.98 Da0.32 minNo
Deamidated / parent (any peptide)0.98 Da0.2–0.5 minNo
Reduced / oxidised cyclic peptide2.02 Da0.5–1.2 minNo
Hexarelin / GHRP-614.02 Da0.48 minMarginal
Met sulfoxide / parent15.99 Da0.3–0.9 minYes
Survodutide / Tirzepatide45.90 Da0.28 minYes
AOD-9604 / hGH frag 176-191163.06 Da0.84 minYes
Any diastereomer pair0.00 Da0.10–0.26 minNo — and no MS resolution helps

Adducts

Sodium and potassium adducts appear at +21.982/z and +37.956/z relative to the protonated species. They are not impurities — they are the same molecule with a different cation attached in the source — and counting them as impurities inflates the impurity total. They are typically 5–17 % of the protonated peak intensity for sodium and under 7 % for potassium, and their presence is a glassware and diluent artefact.

Normative references

Cited because they are the documents the acceptance criteria above are taken from. The index applies them as written and states every deviation.

  • Ph. Eur. 2.2.43 — Mass spectrometry
  • USP <736> — Mass spectrometry
  • ICH Q6B — Specifications for biotechnological products

Related methods

Monoisotopic versus average mass

A 3 Da distinction that produces a 620 ppm error when confused. The most common single mistake in submitted identity data.

Identity

Charge-state deconvolution

Recovering a neutral mass from an electrospray envelope, the arithmetic, and the failure modes that produce confident wrong answers.

Identity

Mass accuracy and calibration

What ppm means at 340 Da and at 4,813 Da, how calibration drifts, and the checks that separate an instrument problem from a material problem.

Identity